，我们还见证了首个 RGB++ 资产 Seal 的增长，Seal 社区推动了三位一体的采用和发展。让我们用 3 个用例来进一步说明： P2P 经济 —— 具有闪电网络激励机制的去中心化云存储。在这种商业模式中，需要存储服务的用户可以与 RGB++ Layer 上的云存储提供商签订智能合约，同意按使用量支付存储容量和带宽费用。该平台利用 CFN 促进用户和云存储提供商之间的快速、低成本支付，并根据实际使用量自动触发支付。反过来，云存储提供商也有动力提供可靠、优质的存储服务，因为他们可以通过闪电网络直接从用户那里获得补偿。这创造了供需的良性循环，用户从低成本、安全的存储解决方案中受益，而云存储提供商则因其对网络的贡献而获得收入。用户保留对其数据的完全控制权，可根据需要授予或撤销访问权限。这种去中心化的云存储平台解决了传统 P2P 文件共享网络的局限性，如缺乏激励、搭便车、性能差与中心化平台控制之间的两难问题 [42]，[43]，它利用闪电网络和智能合约的力量，重新建立了一个强大的、自我维持的 P2P 经济系统。 BTCFi —— 利用「UTXO 乐高」捕捉市场机会。想象一下这样一个场景：用户看到比特币网络上的 Seal 价格飙升，出现了重大市场机会。为了利用这一机会，用户希望将他们的 ccBTC（与 BTC 1:1 锚定且在 CKB 上发行）作为抵押品借入稳定币 RUSD，并立即购买 Seal。安全性至关重要，因此用户无法接受中心化的跨链桥，RGB++ 解决了这一痛点。在单个区块内执行此交易也是一种创新。在这里，UTXO 乐高指的是 UTXO 的模块化和可编程特性，它允许跨不同区块链创建复杂的自动化交易。基于 UTXO，我们可以安全地连接 CKB 和比特币网络之间的操作，确保抵押品锁定、稳定币借贷和 Seal 购买以原子交换的方式进行：要么所有操作都成功，要么都不成功。这种可编程性是 UTXO 的一个显著特征，与以太坊使用的基于账户的模型相比，它能够更精细地控制交易执行。最后，UTXO 模型由于能以并行方式更高效地处理交易数据，尤其是在与多条区块链交互时，通常能降低交易成本。这种方法展示了 BTCFi 如何能够提供比当前 DeFi 解决方案更强大、更安全、更具成本效益的替代方案。 PayFi —— 基于闪电网络的 DEX 实现丝滑的 P2P 支付。比特币闪电网络和 CKB CFN 的融合带来的最有前景的应用之一是为 BTC、稳定币和 RGB++ 资产创建基于闪电网络的 DEX。通过利用 CFN 促进无需信任、跨闪电网络原子交换的能力，用户可以在 CKB 生态系统内轻松地在 BTC 和 USDT 或 RUSD 等稳定币之间进行交换，而无需中心化交易所或 KYC 程序。本质上，这个基于闪电网络的 DEX 可以看作是 VISA 等传统金融网络的一种去中心化、P2P 替代方案，其中节点扮演「银行分行」的角色，并从其抵押的流动性中获得奖励。这种 DEX 使用户能够进行快速、安全和私密的 P2P 交易（而不是与智能合约交互），使他们能够在稳定币的稳定性和 BTC 的数字黄金标准之间无缝转换。原子交换机制确保双方同时收到各自的资产，消除了交易对手风险，增强了平台的整体安全性和可靠性。此外，CFN 的多资产能力为闪电通道内 RGB++ 资产的即时、零费用交易提供了令人兴奋的可能性。例如，用户可以创建用于交易 RGB++ NFT（DOB）或 RGB++ 代币的市场。这些市场提供实时、无摩擦的交易体验，让创作者、收藏者和交易者能够直接进行价值交换，而无需承担高昂的交易费用或等待漫长的确认时间。 5 总结 区块链行业正处于十字路口。一条道路通向以太坊模型的延续，这条路充满中心化、寻租，背离了区块链的核心原则。另一条路是回归比特币的最初愿景，一个赋能个人并实现真正去中心化的 P2P 系统。 选择是明确的。我们必须拥抱比特币复兴及其带来的创新。其中包括 RGB++ Layer、CKB Fiber Network 和原生稳定币。我们必须努力创造一个更公平、更可持续的价值创造和分配模式，摆脱过去以代币为中心的模式，走向以服务为导向的未来。这个未来是 Web5 的未来，它结合了 Web2 和 Web3 的优点。 前方的道路将充满挑战，但回报也将巨大。因此，让我们作为一个社区团结起来，共同致力于比特币 P2P 的愿景。让我们带着早期先驱者的激情和远见去建设、创新和创造。让我们向世界展示 P2P 未来的真正力量。 选择权在我们手中。未来掌握在我们手中。 让我们开始吧。 参考文献 [1] S. Nakamoto, “Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system,” 2008. [2] A. Oram, Peer-to-peer: harnessing the benefits of a disruptive technology. " O’Reilly Media, Inc.", 2001. [3] S. Barile, C. Simone, and M. Calabrese, “The economies (and diseconomies) of distributed technologies: The increasing tension among hierarchy and p2p,” Kybernetes, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 767–785, 2017. [4] C. Rossignoli, C. Frigerio, and L. Mola, “Le implicazioni organizzative di una intranet adot- tata come tecnologia di coordinamento,” Sinergie Italian Journal of Management, no. 61-62, pp. 351–369, 2011. [5] R. Peeters, The algorithmic society: technology, power, and knowledge. Routledge, 2020. [6] P. Baran, “On distributed communications networks,” IEEE transactions on Communications Systems, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 1964. [7] Bitstamp. “What was the blocksize war?” (2023), [Online]. Available: https://www.bitstamp. net/learn/crypto-101/what-was-the-blocksize-war/. [8] R. Zhang and B. Preneel, “Lay down the common metrics: Evaluating proof-of-work consensus protocols’ security,” in 2019 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), IEEE, 2019, pp. 175–192. [9] H. Chen, H. Duan, M. Abdallah, et al., “Web3 metaverse: State-of-the-art and vision,” ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications and Applications, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 1–42, 2023. [10] V. Buterin. “The limits to blockchain scalability.” (2021), [Online]. Available: https : / / vitalik.eth.limo/general/2021/05/23/scaling.html. [11] R. Espejo, “Cybernetics of governance: The cybersyn project 1971–1973,” Social systems and design, pp. 71–90, 2014. [12] Y. Zhang. “Comparison between the utxo and account model.” (2018), [Online]. Available: https://medium.com/nervosnetwork/my-comparison-between-the-utxo-and-account- model-821eb46691b2. [13] J. Coghlan. “Ethereum dev’s paid eigenlayer role sparks debate on ‘conflicted incentives’.” (2024), [Online]. Available: https ://cointelegraph . com / news / ethereum - researcher - eigenlayer-role-conflict-debate. [14] G. Wood et al., “Ethereum: A secure decentralised generalised transaction ledger,” Ethereum project yellow paper, vol. 151, no. 2014, pp. 1–32, 2014. [15] L2beat. “Upgradeability of ethereum l2s.” (2024), [Online]. Available: https://l2beat.com/ multisig-report. [16] U. W. Chohan, Initial coin oflerings (ICOs): Risks, regulation, and accountability. Springer, 2019. [17] A. Walch, “Deconstructing’decentralization’: Exploring the core claim of crypto systems,” 2019. [18] P. Baehr, “The image of the veil in social theory,” Theory and Society, vol. 48, pp. 535–558, 2019. [19] BitcoinMagazine. “What is an ico?” (2017), [Online]. Available: https://bitcoinmagazine. com/guides/what-is-an-ico. [20] D. W. Arner, R. Auer, and J. Frost, “Stablecoins: Risks, potential and regulation,” 2020. [21] P. Howitt, “Beyond search: Fiat money in organized exchange,” International Economic Re- view, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 405–429, 2005. [22] P. Sztorc. “Nothing is cheaper than proof of work.” (2015), [Online]. Available: https://www. truthcoin.info/blog/pow-cheapest/. [23] C. Acedo-Carmona and A. Gomila, “Personal trust increases cooperation beyond general trust,” PloS one, vol. 9, no. 8, e105559, 2014. [24] T. A. Han, L. M. Pereira, and T. Lenaerts, “Evolution of commitment and level of partici- pation in public goods games,” Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 561–583, 2017. [25] J. Xie. “First-class asset.” (2018), [Online]. Available: https://medium.com/nervosnetwork/ first-class-asset-ff4feaf370c4. [26] Cipher. “Rgb++ protocol light paper.” (2024), [Online]. Available: https://github.com/ ckb-cell/RGBPlusPlus-design/blob/main/docs/light-paper-en.md. [27] UTXOStack. “Rgb++ layer: Pioneering a new era for the bitcoin ecosystem.” (2024), [Online]. Available: https://medium.com/@utxostack/rgb- layer- pioneering- a- new- era- for- the-bitcoin-ecosystem-65e48fb5ea9e. [28] J. Poon and T. Dryja, The bitcoin lightning network: Scalable ofl-chain instant payments, 2016. [29] J. Robert, S. Kubler, and S. Ghatpande, “Enhanced lightning network (off-chain)-based mi- cropayment in iot ecosystems,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 112, pp. 283–296, 2020. [30] T. Brignall, “The new panopticon: The internet viewed as a structure of social control,” Theory & Science, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1527–1558, 2002. [31] E. Silfversten, M. Favaro, L. Slapakova, S. Ishikawa, J. Liu, and A. Salas, Exploring the use of Zcash cryptocurrency for illicit or criminal purposes. RAND Santa Monica, CA, USA, 2020. [32] K. Stewart, S. Gunashekar, and C. Manville, Digital Currency: Transacting and Value Ex- change in the Digital Age. Rand Corporation, 2017. [33] J. Baron, A. O’Mahony, D. Manheim, and C. Dion-Schwarz, “National security implications of virtual currency,” Rand Corporation, 2015. [34] J. M. Carroll and V. Bellotti, “Creating value together: The emerging design space of peer- to-peer currency and exchange,” in Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 2015, pp. 1500–1510. [35] P. Dalziel, “On the evolution of money and its implications for price stability,” Journal of Economic Surveys, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 373–393, 2000. [36] UTXOStack. “P2p economy: Leading a blockchain renaissance.” (2024), [Online]. Available: https://medium.com/@utxostack/p2p-economy-leading-a-blockchain-renaissance- d4b091bf2c44. [37] N. Szabo. “Money, blockchains, and social scalability.” (2017), [Online]. Available: https:// unenumerated.blogspot.com/2017/02/money- blockchains- and- social- scalability. html. [38] E. Raymond, “The cathedral and the bazaar,” Knowledge, Technology & Policy, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 23–49, 1999. [39] M. Abiodun. “Jack dorsey’s concept of web5: How does it evolve from web3?” (2023), [Online]. Available: https :// www . cryptopolitan . com / jack - dorseys - concept - of - web5 - how - does-it-evolve-from-web3/. [40] J. Xie. “Bitcoin renaissance: Why and how?” (2024), [Online]. Available: https://substack. com/@ckbecofund/p-145544407. [41] R. Su. “Nostr binding protocol.” (2024), [Online]. Available: https://github.com/RetricSu/ nostr-binding/blob/main/docs/lightpaper.md. [42] D. Guo, Y.-K. Kwok, X. Jin, and J. Deng, “A performance study of incentive schemes in peer-to-peer file-sharing systems,” The Journal of Supercomputing, vol. 72, pp. 1152–1178, 2016. [43] L. Ramaswamy and L. Liu, “Free riding: A new challenge to peer-to-peer file sharing systems,” in 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the, IEEE, 2003, 10–pp. 来源：金色财经lg...
北美站
